@article {2012,
	title = {Eliciting Caregiving Behavior in Dyadic Human-robot Attachment-like Interactions},
	journal = {ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	note = {<a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2133366.2133369">Download</a> (Open Access)},
	pages = {3:1{\textendash}3:24},
	publisher = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY},
	abstract = {We present here the design and applications of an arousal-based model controlling the behavior of a Sony AIBO robot during the exploration of a novel environment: a children{\textquoteright}s play mat. When the robot experiences too many new perceptions, the increase of arousal triggers calls for attention towards its human caregiver. The caregiver can choose to either calm the robot down by providing it with comfort, or to leave the robot coping with the situation on its own. When the arousal of the robot has decreased, the robot moves on to further explore the play mat. We gathered results from two experiments using this arousal-driven control architecture. In the first setting, we show that such a robotic architecture allows the human caregiver to influence greatly the learning outcomes of the exploration episode, with some similarities to a primary caregiver during early childhood. In a second experiment, we tested how human adults behaved in a similar setup with two different robots: one {\textquotedblleft}needy{\textquotedblright}, often demanding attention, and one more independent, requesting far less care or assistance. Our results show that human adults recognise each profile of the robot for what they have been designed, and behave accordingly to what would be expected, caring more for the needy robot than for the other. Additionally, the subjects exhibited a preference and more positive affect whilst interacting and rating the robot we designed as needy. This experiment leads us to the conclusion that our architecture and setup succeeded in eliciting positive and caregiving behavior from adults of different age groups and technological background. Finally, the consistency and reactivity of the robot during this dyadic interaction appeared crucial for the enjoyment and engagement of the human partner.},
	issn = {2160-6455},
	doi = {10.1145/2133366.2133369},
	url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2133366.2133369},
	author = {Antoine Hiolle and Lola Ca{\~n}amero and Davila-Ross, Marina and Kim A. Bard}
}
@inbook {2010,
	title = {Emotion et cognition: les robots comme outils et mod{\`e}les},
	booktitle = {Syst{\`e}mes d{\textquoteright}interaction {\'e}motionnelle},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {Lavoisier Hermes Science},
	organization = {Lavoisier Hermes Science},
	chapter = {9},
	address = {Paris, France},
	isbn = {978-2-7462-2115-4},
	author = {Lola Ca{\~n}amero and Philippe Gaussier and C Hasson and Antoine Hiolle},
	editor = {Catherine Pelachaud}
}
@inbook {2009,
	title = {Emotion Modelling and Facial Affect Recognition in Human-Computer and Human-Robot Interaction},
	booktitle = {Affective Computing, Emotion Modelling, Synthesis and Recognition},
	year = {2009},
	publisher = {InTechOpen Publishers},
	organization = {InTechOpen Publishers},
	chapter = {12},
	isbn = {978-3-902613-42-4},
	doi = {10.5772/6648},
	url = {http://www.intechopen.com/books/state_of_the_art_in_face_recognition/emotion_modelling_and_facial_affect_recognition_in_human-computer_and_human-robot_interaction},
	author = {Lori Malatesta and John C Murray and Amaryllis Raouzaiou and Antoine Hiolle and Lola Ca{\~n}amero and Kostas Karpouzis},
	editor = {Mario I. Chacon-M.}
}
